System Testing Questionnaire

Section 1: Background Information

Annotator ID:

Legal Expertise Level:

Familiarity with IRAC Methodology:

Section 2: System Usability and Interface

How intuitive is the user interface of the system? Very intuitive Intuitive Neutral Difficult to navigate Very difficult to navigate

Were there any technical issues or bugs encountered during the use of the system?

How satisfied are you with the system's response time (speed of processing and returning results)? Very satisfied Satisfied Neutral Unsatisfied Very unsatisfied

Section 3: System Performance and Output Quality

Issue Quality

How accurately does the system identify and categorize legal issues (Issue Identification) in a scenario?
Very accurate
Accurate
Neutral
Inaccurate
Very inaccurate

Does the system identify all relevant issues and distinguish between primary and secondary issues?
Very well
Well
Neutral
Poorly
Very poorly

Rule Quality

How accurately does the system retrieve and present relevant legal rules (Rule Retrieval) for the identified issues?
Very accurate
Accurate
Neutral
Inaccurate
Very inaccurate

Are the legal rules retrieved by the system comprehensive, relevant, and well-cited?
Very comprehensive and well-cited
Comprehensive and relevant
Neutral
Somewhat irrelevant
Very irrelevant

Application Quality

How well does the system apply the legal rules to the facts of the scenario (Application)?
Excellent application
Good application
Neutral
Poor application
Very poor application

Is the reasoning behind the application of legal rules to the facts clear, logical, and easy to follow?
Very clear and logical
Clear and logical
Neutral
Somewhat unclear or illogical
Very unclear or illogical

Conclusion Quality

How well does the system generate logical and sound conclusions (Conclusion Generation) for each legal scenario?
Very well
Well
Neutral
Poorly
Very poorly

How consistent are the conclusions generated by the system with established legal principles and precedents?
Very consistent
Consistent
Neutral
Inconsistent
Very inconsistent

Overall Quality

Rate the overall quality of the system's legal analysis.
Excellent
Good
Neutral
Poor
Very poor

Would you recommend this system for legal analysis tasks to other professionals or students?
Definitely yes
Probably yes
Unsure
Probably no
Definitely no

Section 4: Comparative Evaluation

How does the system's analysis compare to a human legal expert's analysis? Much better than a human expert Better than a human expert Comparable to a human expert Worse than a human expert Much worse than a human expert

Section 5: User Experience and Suggestions

What features did you find most useful in the system?

What features or improvements would you suggest for the system?

Section 6: Enhancement of Understanding of Law

Do you think the system helps you better understand legal concepts and reasoning? Definitely yes Probably yes Unsure Probably no Definitely no

Does the system improve your efficiency in understanding legal cases and principles? Significantly Moderately Slightly Not at all